Blog 6: Differentiating Instruction for Struggling Readers
The first chapter by Beers talked about the importance of relationships with students, especially those who are struggling. The authors emphasizzed that teachers need to have high expectations for students, especially those who have high expectations for students, and not "dumb down" the curriculum for them. Instead, teachers should be activating students prior knowledge and connecting it to new content. This prior knowledge should not just be facts, but elements of students' lives and experiences they realte to. I think this concept is super important since it helps to spark interest, and can also help students understand new concepts. Even if something is confusing, if students can connect parts of the concept to something they understand, they are able to begin understanding the concept.
The authors also discussed "Thinking Maps," visual graphic organizers used for different purposes and language functions. I thought that these were great options to help stdents brainstorm, classify, and connect new ideas.
The chapter by Hinchman discussed specific strategies for differentiating instruction. The authors discussed three methods: Multiple Intelligences (developing activities to activate different intelligences), Universal Design for Learning (UDL) (using technology and multiple options to create adaptive learning segments), and SIOP (using background knowledge and language objectives to support new content). I ahd heard of all these methods before, but still find SIOP a little confusing becuase of its many facets.
The authors then describe the scenario of a teacher incorporating these methods. I found this very helpful, especially the teachers use of UDL. She communicated content in different ways (audio and visual) and even gave students a choice in how they would do their final project. I think choices can be a big motivator for students since when they can choose their own project, they may feel more passionate about it. Choices also let students communicate in their own format, fostering confidence.
Discussion Questions:
How can we let students choose but still guide content?
How could thinking maps be used in less language-heavy subjects like math?
How can teachers use multiple intelligences without being overwhelmed by variations?
The authors also discussed "Thinking Maps," visual graphic organizers used for different purposes and language functions. I thought that these were great options to help stdents brainstorm, classify, and connect new ideas.
The chapter by Hinchman discussed specific strategies for differentiating instruction. The authors discussed three methods: Multiple Intelligences (developing activities to activate different intelligences), Universal Design for Learning (UDL) (using technology and multiple options to create adaptive learning segments), and SIOP (using background knowledge and language objectives to support new content). I ahd heard of all these methods before, but still find SIOP a little confusing becuase of its many facets.
The authors then describe the scenario of a teacher incorporating these methods. I found this very helpful, especially the teachers use of UDL. She communicated content in different ways (audio and visual) and even gave students a choice in how they would do their final project. I think choices can be a big motivator for students since when they can choose their own project, they may feel more passionate about it. Choices also let students communicate in their own format, fostering confidence.
Discussion Questions:
How can we let students choose but still guide content?
How could thinking maps be used in less language-heavy subjects like math?
How can teachers use multiple intelligences without being overwhelmed by variations?
Comments
Post a Comment